I was surprised to know that each person perceives colours differently. It appears that the 'red' I see may differ slightly from the 'red' others see.
cited from: Photoreceptors: Rods and cones | Kenhub
The reason for this is that the number of colour-identifying cells called cones in the centre of the retina of the eye differs from person to person.
I imagine that individual differences in cone cells are like differences in skin texture or teeth. How much the colour vision differs is just like the difference between individuals with, for example, 'black hair' or 'brownish eyes', but we don't know exactly how much it differs from our own colour vision without transplanting someone else's retina.
Even if the colours seen are exactly the same, differences in people's perception of what colour they describe them as may also affect the 'colour difference'.
Once, when I mentioned researching the aesthetics of images, someone asked me, 'Are there any particular shades you would recommend for web design?' I was unable to answer. This simple question, along with the realization that colours can appear differently, inspired me to learn more about colour.
First of all, there are several colour systems and they are not unified. There is the concept of colour space and how to describe it. There are several methods, each with different applications. Among them, the CIE 1976 Lab colour space is widely used in recent digitisation.
International standard system
●CIE 1931 RGB: Digital displays such as televisions.
●CIE 1976 Lab* colour space / CIE 1976 Luv* colour space: For design, printing, image processing,
quality control, etc. Useful for colour comparison and measurement, such as colour difference and
colour uniformity. Developed based on human vision. (The latest system)
Other colour systems
●CMYK: Used in the printing industry.
●Munsell colour system: Used for colour measurement and quality control in industry (late 19th).
Billmeyer and Saltzman's Principles of Color Technology (Roy S. Berns, 2019. Willey. 978-1119367222 ) is well organized like an encyclopedia of colors, with annotated references throughout the text and a six-page index at the end that is very useful for tracing the history and latest trends in color. The author, Berns, is a student of Fred W. Billmeyer, Jr, author of the first edition of this book, and a professor at the Munsell Color Science Laboratory at Rochester Institute of Technology. So his students have been taking over and building up their research for nearly 25 years in a row. The latest version is the 4th edition, published in 2024, which has been substantially updated from the 3rd edition of 5 years ago, but the 3rd edition can be purchased online, chapter by chapter, at this URL.
Billmeyer and Saltzman's Principles of Color Technology | Wiley Online Books
You can see that the world of color is very mathematical. Color is represented by multidimensional variables, and there are heaps of multivariate matrix calculations.
Now, thinking again about the answer to "what is a good color tone for the Web," I realized that it depends on the purpose of what impression you want the Web to make on others. Whether you want to attract or relax, the color tones that are appropriate for that purpose will be "good tones. So, what kind of color tones are "attracting" or "relaxing"? In 2013, Moretti et al. proposed a tool called Color Harmonizer to support effective web design based on classical color harmony theory.
Other papers suggest that users identify the attractiveness of a website within 50 milliseconds of their first visit, and since the colors that first catch their eyes are very important, we propose a method that takes cultural background into account in the selection of shades that will attract users.
After researching this topic, I was surprised to find out that it was physicists and chemists who came up with the concept of colour in the first place, and that it was physicists and chemists who developed it, which was brilliant. Although there were old theories of colour, such as Aristotle's "All colours arise from between black and white" and Da Vinci's "Distant objects make more intense colours", Newton's physical experiments showed that light was split into colours by prisms and colour science began, so physics is the source. Here is a list of researchers in chronological order.
Sir Isaac Newton
(1642-1727)
Philosophers, Physicists, Mathematicians.
Astronomers and theologians
Experiment-driven Newtonian colour theory
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
(1749-1832)
Poet, Natural Scientist, Philosopher
The importance of the human subjectivity and the human eye
Goethe's theory of colour
Michel-Eugène Chevreul
(1786-1889)
Chemist.
First harmonisation theory,
"The bible of colours".
Chevreul's theory of colour harmony.
George Field
(1777-1854)
Chemist, Dyer
By the three primary colours red, yellow and blue
Field colour harmonisation theory
Incidentally, the question of whether light, the source of colour, is a particle or a wave has been a mystery for more than 300 years (!). Einstein solved this mystery in 1905 by showing that light is both a wave and a particle. This fact that it is both a wave and a particle is called 'quantum'.
Ogden Nicholas Rood
(1831-1902)
Physicist
Useful for art and industry
Rood's modern colour theory
Henry Albert Munsell
(1858-1918)
Art teachers, Painters
First international standard system
Munsell colour system
Friedrich Wilhelm Ostwald
(1853-1932)
Chemist, Philosopher, Educator
'Harmony equals order'
Ostwald colour system
Albert Einstein
(1879-1955)
Theoretical physicist
Light is a wave and a particle
Light quantum hypothesis
Parry Moon & Domina E. Spencer
(1898-1988) (1920-2022)
Engineers / Physicists
Colour quantification
Moon & Spencer's colour harmonisation theory
Johannes Itten
(1888-1967)
Artist
Bauhaus teacher
Itten's theory of colour harmony
Faber Birren
(1900-1988)
Colour Consultant
'Beautiful colours are colours that sell well'
Billen's theory of colour harmony
Deane Brewster Judd
(1900-1972)
Physicist
Giant of the American Colour Society
Judd's theory of colour harmony
The CIE 1976 Lab* and Lub* colour spaces, which are now widely used, were developed during the active period of Billen and Judd. However, it is unclear whether they were directly involved in the arrangements of the International Commission on Illumination (CIE), which is based in Switzerland. It is interesting to note that the Illuminating Commission decided on the system of colour, possibly due to the fact that the source of colour is light.
I wonder if the CIE 1976 UCS colour space will unify with the digitalisation or if their claims will coexist like the Freudian and Jungian schools of psychology. The CIE 1976 colour space was created based on human vision, but it is unclear how individual cone differences are considered. Therefore, I researched this topic.
First, many papers discuss color integration and consistency among the various color systems, and they seem to be aiming at unifying the color space.
In 2022, Smith et al. developed Virtual Colour Atlas , a unification tool for seven colour systems (Colourcurve, Coloroid, DIN 6164, Munsell, OSA-UCS, NCS, Swiss Colour Atlas 2541), three colour spaces (CIE xyY, CIELAB, CIELUV), and three colour gamuts (BS:5252, RAL 840-HR, RAL 841-GL).
The tool is available for free on the web and was released two years ago. If this tool gains acceptance from various circles and similar ideas are consolidated, the colour system will naturally become unified. However, on page 71 of Billmeyer and Saltzman's Principles of Color Technology, Berns states that "the goal of a uniform color space is not achievable ". Virtual Colour Atlas claims to have integrated three color spaces, but what other color spaces are there and why are they not achievable? It seems to me that there are inconsistencies in the calculations between the other color spaces.
The treatment of cones in CIE 1976 is currently under investigation.